<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carnival of Journalism: Five positive predictions for new media in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/</link>
	<description>Ryan Sholin on the future of newspapers, online news and journalism education.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sudha.K &#187; Why 2009 Won&#8217;t Be the year of Mobile Web or Mobile Video</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13644</link>
		<dc:creator>sudha.K &#187; Why 2009 Won&#8217;t Be the year of Mobile Web or Mobile Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1199#comment-13644</guid>
		<description>[...] see quite a few thoughtful people predicting that 2009 will be the year when the mobile web, particularly mobile video will take off.  The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see quite a few thoughtful people predicting that 2009 will be the year when the mobile web, particularly mobile video will take off.  The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudhak</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1199#comment-13643</guid>
		<description>Respectfully disagree on a few your points. Flixwagon, Qik, Livecastr are still having device and carrier issues. I tried Qik and Flixwagon on a number of devices with a number of Canadian carriers - very buggy. When I did it get to work it sucked my battery dry. Don&#039;t get me wrong love the applications and I am cheering them on. 

Unless the economy pick up, alternative online business models won&#039;t flourish. Advertising (online or offline) are still the bulk of revenue for media - advertisers are cutting back. Plus, advertisers are still very conservative and suspicious of social media platforms. Most advertisers I have dealt with care about Page Views and Unique visitors and that is it. Advertising revenue is far too discreet and incremental unless you are a small shop, generating massive page views and visitors

Having said that, I would rather be wrong.
peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully disagree on a few your points. Flixwagon, Qik, Livecastr are still having device and carrier issues. I tried Qik and Flixwagon on a number of devices with a number of Canadian carriers &#8211; very buggy. When I did it get to work it sucked my battery dry. Don&#8217;t get me wrong love the applications and I am cheering them on. </p>
<p>Unless the economy pick up, alternative online business models won&#8217;t flourish. Advertising (online or offline) are still the bulk of revenue for media &#8211; advertisers are cutting back. Plus, advertisers are still very conservative and suspicious of social media platforms. Most advertisers I have dealt with care about Page Views and Unique visitors and that is it. Advertising revenue is far too discreet and incremental unless you are a small shop, generating massive page views and visitors</p>
<p>Having said that, I would rather be wrong.<br />
peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher - Monday squibs</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13641</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher - Monday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1199#comment-13641</guid>
		<description>[...] most interesting predictions. (Note: There&#8217;s a link to the carnival in his post.) Related: Ryan Sholin also sees more local startups in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most interesting predictions. (Note: There&#8217;s a link to the carnival in his post.) Related: Ryan Sholin also sees more local startups in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Gable</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/21/carnival-of-journalism-five-positive-predictions-for-new-media-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13639</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Gable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1199#comment-13639</guid>
		<description>How about these?

-- News organizations will learn how to use Twitter and other new media in ways that don&#039;t trivialize or demean either the organization or the medium itself. (For a &quot;what not to do&quot; case in point, see CNN&#039;s segment today in which coverage of the Denver plane crash was augmented with tweets from viewers. The headline was &quot;PLANE CRASH! OMG!&quot; and the tweets running along the bottom of the screen informed us of things like &quot;I once twittered from a Bon Jovi concert&quot; and &quot;Believe it or not, I twitter from the shower.&quot; The end result? If you had in your mind the idea that new media is inherently trivial and using it requires you to talk like a 12-year-old girl, that idea was reinforced.)

-- News organizations will stop seeing themselves as &quot;old media&quot; or &quot;new media&quot; companies, and instead will start seeing themselves as &quot;information providers,&quot; with the medium of choice becoming almost a secondary concern.  When launching new projects, these organizations will not automatically default to print, or the Web, or anything else, but instead will start by saying &quot;What do we want to accomplish with the project, and how can we best use the various media at our disposal to make it happen?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about these?</p>
<p>&#8211; News organizations will learn how to use Twitter and other new media in ways that don&#8217;t trivialize or demean either the organization or the medium itself. (For a &#8220;what not to do&#8221; case in point, see CNN&#8217;s segment today in which coverage of the Denver plane crash was augmented with tweets from viewers. The headline was &#8220;PLANE CRASH! OMG!&#8221; and the tweets running along the bottom of the screen informed us of things like &#8220;I once twittered from a Bon Jovi concert&#8221; and &#8220;Believe it or not, I twitter from the shower.&#8221; The end result? If you had in your mind the idea that new media is inherently trivial and using it requires you to talk like a 12-year-old girl, that idea was reinforced.)</p>
<p>&#8211; News organizations will stop seeing themselves as &#8220;old media&#8221; or &#8220;new media&#8221; companies, and instead will start seeing themselves as &#8220;information providers,&#8221; with the medium of choice becoming almost a secondary concern.  When launching new projects, these organizations will not automatically default to print, or the Web, or anything else, but instead will start by saying &#8220;What do we want to accomplish with the project, and how can we best use the various media at our disposal to make it happen?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
