<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this the democratization of media or a Media Republic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/19/is-this-the-democratization-of-media-or-a-media-republic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/19/is-this-the-democratization-of-media-or-a-media-republic/</link>
	<description>The future of news. And more. No funny stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/19/is-this-the-democratization-of-media-or-a-media-republic/comment-page-1/#comment-13627</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1196#comment-13627</guid>
		<description>@Nathan - Well, it&#039;s been a couple years since I picked any up, but sure, reading McLuhan is often a good idea.

I suppose I&#039;ve gotten out of the habit of thinking about media theory, but there&#039;s plenty of relevant stuff out there dealing with journalists, the Web, and credibility.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://deuze.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Deuze&lt;/a&gt; is particularly good -- I can send you a couple papers of his if you&#039;re interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan &#8211; Well, it&#8217;s been a couple years since I picked any up, but sure, reading McLuhan is often a good idea.</p>
<p>I suppose I&#8217;ve gotten out of the habit of thinking about media theory, but there&#8217;s plenty of relevant stuff out there dealing with journalists, the Web, and credibility.  <a href="http://deuze.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Mark Deuze</a> is particularly good &#8212; I can send you a couple papers of his if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Borror</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/19/is-this-the-democratization-of-media-or-a-media-republic/comment-page-1/#comment-13626</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Borror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1196#comment-13626</guid>
		<description>This makes me want to go read more McLuhan — very interesting stuff here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me want to go read more McLuhan — very interesting stuff here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Alexander</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2008/12/19/is-this-the-democratization-of-media-or-a-media-republic/comment-page-1/#comment-13622</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansholin.com/?p=1196#comment-13622</guid>
		<description>The change from what you describe as a media republic to a democratisation of media seems to be happening on a large scale.  I definitely think that this is a very positive development, in terms of commentary at least.  Professional journalists are no strangers to bias and have been often guilty of plagiarism or using dubious or misquoted sources.  While they might have better writing skills than the average blogger they are bound by editorial policy and the interests of advertisers and shareholders.  The fact that anyone now has the ability to easily publish their views is a major advance in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change from what you describe as a media republic to a democratisation of media seems to be happening on a large scale.  I definitely think that this is a very positive development, in terms of commentary at least.  Professional journalists are no strangers to bias and have been often guilty of plagiarism or using dubious or misquoted sources.  While they might have better writing skills than the average blogger they are bound by editorial policy and the interests of advertisers and shareholders.  The fact that anyone now has the ability to easily publish their views is a major advance in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

