<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why it&#8217;s good that I didn&#8217;t go to DC this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryansholin.com/2006/10/06/why-its-good-that-i-didnt-go-to-dc-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/10/06/why-its-good-that-i-didnt-go-to-dc-this-week/</link>
	<description>The future of news. And more. No funny stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.A. McCune</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/10/06/why-its-good-that-i-didnt-go-to-dc-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>C.A. McCune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryansholin.com/2006/10/06/why-its-good-that-i-didnt-go-to-dc-this-week/#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Amen! I&#039;m with Doc Searls on this. I hate walled-off newspaper archives. That annoys me as much as the NYT putting all of its top columnists behind the &quot;Times Select&quot; firewall. If you want to be influental in U.S. society, why put your most influential commentators off-limits to most of your online readers?

I actually don&#039;t mind how Salon.com and some other online pubs handle it, by giving its readers the option of subscribing or sitting through a short advertisement to get to the rest of the story. Usually Salon&#039;s advertisements are well done and pretty entertaining...and short enough not to be too annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! I&#8217;m with Doc Searls on this. I hate walled-off newspaper archives. That annoys me as much as the NYT putting all of its top columnists behind the &#8220;Times Select&#8221; firewall. If you want to be influental in U.S. society, why put your most influential commentators off-limits to most of your online readers?</p>
<p>I actually don&#8217;t mind how Salon.com and some other online pubs handle it, by giving its readers the option of subscribing or sitting through a short advertisement to get to the rest of the story. Usually Salon&#8217;s advertisements are well done and pretty entertaining&#8230;and short enough not to be too annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

