<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enough handwringing, let&#8217;s get down to business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/</link>
	<description>The future of news. And more. No funny stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Fine Young Audiences, Fine Young Media (with apologies to Fine Young Journalist, but none to FYC)</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/comment-page-1/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Fine Young Audiences, Fine Young Media (with apologies to Fine Young Journalist, but none to FYC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 22:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>[...] More of the conclusion he draws comes from his response to Ryan Sholin, another young journo, who&#039;d posted a good deal about it himself, and concluded:&#160; &quot;Now that newspapers can shoot, edit, and post video, audio, and text updates nearly as fast as anyone else, they&#8217;ve arrived at the next frontier of competition: The Readers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More of the conclusion he draws comes from his response to Ryan Sholin, another young journo, who&#39;d posted a good deal about it himself, and concluded:&nbsp; &quot;Now that newspapers can shoot, edit, and post video, audio, and text updates nearly as fast as anyone else, they&rsquo;ve arrived at the next frontier of competition: The Readers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invisible Inkling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The missing link for student newspapers: Software to support a continuous news desk</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/comment-page-1/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Invisible Inkling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The missing link for student newspapers: Software to support a continuous news desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not (just) going to be a part of the handwringing chorus, so here&#8217;s a specific, albeit nebulous proposal: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not (just) going to be a part of the handwringing chorus, so here&#8217;s a specific, albeit nebulous proposal: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Rosen</title>
		<link>http://ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryansholin.com/2006/08/28/enough-handwringing-lets-get-down-to-business/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>Ryan:  Actually I wasn&#039;t there.  Well, maybe in spirit.  It was another Jay that Weinberger kept referring to in his notes.  I did however link to his post at my new post, an update onNewAssignment.Net, which is worth your time since it follows up on that networked journalism piece you did.  Click my name for it.  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan:  Actually I wasn&#8217;t there.  Well, maybe in spirit.  It was another Jay that Weinberger kept referring to in his notes.  I did however link to his post at my new post, an update onNewAssignment.Net, which is worth your time since it follows up on that networked journalism piece you did.  Click my name for it.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

